A | IWAKI, Japan -- A member of the International Atomic Energy Agency team visiting Fukushima for its first marine sampling since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant started releasing treated radioactive wastewater into the sea said Thursday he does not expect any rise in radiation levels in the fish caught in the regional seas.The IAEA team watched flounder and other popular kinds of fish being caught off the coast earlier Thursday and brought on boats to the Hisanohama port in southern Fukushima for an auction.“I can say that we don’t expect to see any change starting in the fish," said Paul McGinnity, an IAEA marine radiology scientist.A small rise in the levels of tritium, which cannot be removed from the Fukushima Daiichi wastewater by the plant's treatment system called ALPS, is possible in locations close to the discharge points, but the levels of radioactivity are expected to be similar to those measured before the discharge last year, he said. Fukushima Daiichi started releasing wastewater into the sea on Aug. 24. The release, which is expected to continue for decades, has been strongly opposed by fishing groups and neighboring countries including South Korea, where hundreds of people have protested.China immediately banned all imports of Japanese seafood the day the release began, badly hurting Japanese seafood producers, processors and exporters, and Russia recently joined China in the trade restrictions.The IAEA has reviewed the safety of the wastewater release and concluded in July that if carried out as planned, it would have a negligible impact on the environment, marine life and human health.During the Oct. 16-23 visit, the IAEA team also inspected the collection and processing of seawater and marine sediment near the plant, which suffered triple meltdowns following the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.The IAEA's visit is significant not only because it is the first since the discharge began but also since the IAEA will be able to see firsthand how the fish is sampled and packed, McGinnity said. This will help them better evaluate the results, not just from laboratory testing and data analysis, he said.IAEA selected six species of fish — olive flounder, crimson sea bream, redwing searobin, Japanese jack mackerel, silver croaker and vermiculated puffer fish — because they are known to have higher levels of radioactivity than other species due to the areas they tend to move around in, McGinnity said. The Japanese government asked the IAEA to conduct the environmental and fish sampling to build confidence about the data that Japan provides amid skepticism in some IAEA member states, McGinnity said without identifying which countries.The sample collection team includes two staff from the IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories in Monaco, as well as experts from laboratories in China, South Korea and Canada.The fish collected Thursday were to be shipped to a Fisheries Agency laboratory in Chiba, near Tokyo, where the IAEA team will inspect them on Friday.They will send identical samples to about a dozen participating laboratories, including in Japan, China, South Korea and Canada, for comparison and analysis of radioactivity and evaluation, the IAEA said. The sampling work will be followed by a separate IAEA task force that will review the safety of the treated radioactive water.Japan’s government has set up a relief fund to help find new markets and reduce the impact of China’s seafood ban. Measures include the temporary purchase, freezing and storage of seafood and promotion of seafood sales at home.TEPCO and the government say discharging the water into the sea is unavoidable because the tanks will reach their 1.37 million-ton capacity next year and space at the plant will be needed for its decommissioning, which is expected to take decades, if it is achievable at all.They say the water is treated to reduce radioactive materials to safe levels, and then is diluted with seawater by hundreds of times to make it much safer than international standards. Some experts say such long-term release of low-dose radioactivity is unprecedented and requires close monitoring.。 据8月24日封面新闻报道，一位消费者于5月份在某购物平台买了6罐黄油啤酒，喝了之后觉得口味并不如在其他几家店买的那么好，于是留下了一条表明“香精味很浓”的评论，商家却在评论回复里公开了她的个人地址。
B | 这位消费者还发现，除自己之外，还有多个留下中差评的买家被同一商家“开盒”，且夹带污言秽语。目前该店铺已更名且下架全部商品，北京市顺义区市场监管局胜利所已介入调解。 不同于线下购物，网购消费者无法直观核验商品品质，真实用户评价既是其他消费者的重要决策参考，也是倒逼商家提质增效、诚信经营的关键手段。好评是认可，差评是警醒，各类客观评价都是消费者合法正当的表达权利，受法律保护。 此番事件中，买家仅针对黄油啤酒的口感作出客观评价，无恶意抹黑、造谣诋毁之意，是合理行使消费评价权。而涉事商家非但不反思产品品质问题，反而在评论区曝光买家地址、姓氏，搭配污秽言语进行人身攻击，甚至通过手机号拨打骚扰电话。这种行为已不仅仅是“售后争议”，而构成多重违法。 消费者的收货地址、联系方式、姓名等信息均属于受法律保护的个人隐私信息，商家未经允许擅自公开、肆意泄露，违反个人信息保护法相关规定，涉嫌侵犯公民个人信息权。而依托隐私信息对消费者进行言语辱骂、电话骚扰、舆论施压，更涉嫌寻衅滋事、人格侵权。商家试图以隐私曝光来威胁消费者，阻止其进行真实客观的消费评价，本质是用非法手段碾压消费者的合法维权权利。 此次事件并非个案，而是电商行业隐性乱象的显性爆发。长期以来，部分商家深陷“差评焦虑”，不去精进产品、优化服务，而是想方设法压制负面评价。私下私信骚扰、诱导删评、有偿改评已成常态，而此次商家恶意“开盒”报复，则将行业潜规则升级为明目张胆的恶意侵权，突破了商业经营的底线，也击穿了社会公序良俗。 乱象的滋生，根源在于部分商家法律意识缺失，也凸显出电商平台监管缺位、惩戒力度不足。平台手握店铺管理、纠纷处置的核心权限，本应筑牢隐私保护防线，严打差评报复行为。但当下平台对此类行为处置滞后、惩戒偏轻，多以整改下架了事，低廉的违规成本，让商家敢于肆意侵权、挑战规则。 市场监管部门的介入，是整治乱象、维权纠错的关键举措，但调解不能止于简单道歉整改，必须从严追责、以儆效尤。同时要压实平台主体责任，完善差评保护机制，搭建违规行为快速处置通道，从源头上杜绝“开盒报复”。 真实客观的消费评价，是网购生态良性运转的基石。商家的口碑从来不是靠压制差评换来的，而是靠过硬的产品品质、真诚的售后服务积累而来。
C | 唯有商家坚守诚信底线、平台筑牢监管屏障、监管部门从严执纪问责，才能守护好消费者的合法权益，让每次真实消费评价都能被尊重，让网购环境回归公平透明。(工人日报 吴睿鸫)。
Current article:http://s8q2ytw.wenwancaomohenenqiongpangshun.bond/u7o/uczerw6.html
Published on:00:00:00
